Why do conservatives allow liberals to get away with painting conservatives as hate-mongers, who are uncaring and uncompassionate when by their very own actions liberals show hate and a lack of understanding of what is true compassion? How is it logical that anyone could believe it is compassionate to by force take the income of one person and funnel it to the Federal Government, who then funnels it back to a different part of the country that some politician believes is worthy of “societies” compassion? Whether it is a king, a dictator or a group of elected officials how is this unjust redistribution of wealth any different? The answer it is not! 

True compassion comes from the heart and not the barrel of a gun. True compassion takes effort on the individual to determine a worthy cause for his or her kindness. A society that teaches its citizens to seek out those in need, through charities or individual giving, is a truly compassionate society. It is proven time and time again that conservatives are more compassionate through the number of dollars they give to charities vs. so called compassionate liberals. The problem with liberals is they want someone else to take ownership of compassion. If a liberal can pass a law that forces their brand of compassion upon society they feel good. If conservatives take it upon themselves to help another person they feel good. Tell me, which one is truly compassionate?

On can look at the current administration to see how back words and uncompassionate liberalism is in action. The current administration is determined to hurt charitable giving through its tax policy. The current administration is showing it’s egotistic, elitism by stealing from one group of citizens to give to those it feels more worthy. No, liberalism practices a false compassion, which leads to a less efficient way to help others and teaches laziness to citizens so they fail to put real compassion into practice.